ZIENAIDA RAMONA FAJARDO MOYA, PETITIONER,
v.
ROSALBA, INC., ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1965-05-26
No. 34112
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.
175 So. 2d 530 Florida Supreme Court (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date December 29, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law. The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL and O’CONNELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • THE Florida BAR v. Curry, 211 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1968)
    …ntly and added the six months suspension. We are not constrained to overturn the finding of the Board of Governors. The third point is: “Where pursuant to reapportionment of Board of Governors of Florida Bar (in the matter of The Florida Bar, Fla., 175 So. 2d 530) the Board of Governors appointed additional members to fill said newly created offices, instead of election by the active members of The Florida Bar, was the enlarged Board of Governors unconstitutional and unlawfully constituted and any action tak…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw