HITCHCOCK
v.
HITCHCOCK

U.S. | 1940-10-14
No. 175
311 U.S. 651 Supreme Court of the United States (1940) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Cammer v. United States, 223 F.2d 322 (D.C. Cir. 1955)
    …evitable impact on the grand jurors.3 The grand jury is an appendage of the court and “proceedings before it are to be regarded as being proceedings in the court.” Camarota v. United States, 3 Cir., 1940, 111 F. 2d 243, 246, certiorari denied 1940, 311 U.S. 651, 61 S.Ct. 16, 85 L.Ed. 416. See also, United States v. Smyth, D.C.N.D.Cal.1952, 104 F.Supp. 283, 291. The grand jury acts “under the authority of the court,” we note in Savin, Petitioner, 1889, 131 U.S. 267, 277, 9 S.Ct. 699, 702, which predicated…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw