TOWN OF WEST MIAMI, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, PETITIONER,
v.
JULIAN I. WEINKLE, AS TRUSTEE FOR ERNICE SHIRLEY WEINKLE, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1965-05-19
No. 34021
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WILLIS, Circuit Judge, concur.
175 So. 2d 196 Florida Supreme Court (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we are requested to review a decision of a District Court of Appeal, 170 So.2d 61, which allegedly conflicts with prior decisions of this court.

Our initial examination of the petition and record suggested a possible jurisdictional conflict. We issued the writ and have heard arguments on both jurisdiction and merits.

After a thorough consideration of the petition and record we are now led to conclude that no jurisdictional conflict of decisions is present. Finding, therefore, that *197the writ was improvidently issued, it is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., and WILLIS, Circuit Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hoisington v. Kulchin, 178 So. 2d 349 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
    …Fla.1965, 177 So. 2d 221, wherein it has clearly rec [*351] ognized its jurisdiction and authority to review a per curiam judgment of affirmance without opinion, which is likewise indicated by the opinion in Town of West Miami v. Weinkle, Fla.1965, 175 So. 2d 196, reviewing a per curiam judgment without opinion rendered by this court in Town of West Miami v. Weinkle, Fla.App.1964, 170 So. 2d 61. There have also been other opinions by the Supreme Court of Florida recognizing the authority to review judgments…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw