ASPRODITES, ADMINISTRATRIX,

v.

STANDARD FRUIT & STEAMSHIP CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Sojak v. Hudson Waterways Corp., 590 F.2d 53 (2d Cir. 1978)
  …racting, Inc., 471 F. 2d 536, 542 (2d Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 412 U.S. 943, 93 S.Ct. 2778, 37 L.Ed.2d 404 (1973). These requisites were not met in this case. See Asprodites v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co., 108 F. 2d 728 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 310 U.S. 642, 60 S.Ct. 1089, 84 L.Ed. 1410 (1940). Plaintiff’s third claim of error relates to certain evidence regarding custom and usage which he attempted to introduce to rebut an allegation of contributory negligence. The admissibility of evidence such as t…
• Vileski v. Pacific-Atlantic S. S. Co., 163 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1947)
  …ork in a dangerous place. The contrary is held in Field v. Waterman S. S. Corp., 5 Cir., 104 F. 2d 849; cf. Patton-Tully Trans. Co. v. Turner, 8 Cir., 269 F. 334; Asprodites v. Standard Fruit & Steamship Co., 5 Cir., 108 F. 2d 728, certiorari denied 310 U.S. 642, 60 S.Ct. 1089, 84 L.Ed. 1410; Brittingham, v. Ore. S. S. Corp., 4 Cir., 62 F. 2d 616, 617; Roberts v. United Fisheries Vessels Co., 1 Cir., 141 F. 2d 288. Libelant relies upon Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. Smith, 305 U.S. 424, 59 S.Ct. 262, 83 L.Ed. 26…