WEBB-CRAWFORD CO. ET AL.

v.

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

Citator

Cited By (12 total)

• Ortega v. Ragen, 216 F.2d 561 (7th Cir. 1954)
  …that denying an appeal to a prisoner convicted in a state court is not a denial of due process. Andrews v. Swartz, 156 U.S. 272, 275, 15 S.Ct. 389, 39 L.Ed. 422; Errington v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 110 F. 2d 384, 386, 127 A.L.R. 1467, certiorari denied 310 U.S. 638, 60 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed. 1407; Moore v. Aderhold, 10 Cir., 108 F. 2d 729, 732. If appeals are provided for there must be no arbitrary discrimination and if plaintiff could show that he was not allowed to appeal his conviction while others in his po…
• United States v. Troiano, 365 F.2d 416 (3d Cir. 1966)
  …re “obligations of the United States” within the meaning of this statute. 49 U.S.C. § 787 (f); 18 U.S.C. § 8; United States v. Pappas, 2d Cir., 1943, 134 F. 2d 922; Errington v. Hudspeth, 10th Cir., 1940, 110 F. 2d 384, 127 A.L.R. 1467, cert. denied 310 U.S. 638, 60 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed. 1407. The statute also directs that “[a]ny * * * vehicle * * * which * * * is being used” to carry any contraband article “shall be seized and forfeited”. 49 U.S.C. § 782. True, such seizure must be supported by probable c…
• United States v. Drumright, 534 F.2d 1383 (10th Cir. 1976)
  …e also testified that, in the form in which the bill had been presented to the store, redemption would not have been made. The value of the altered obligation is immaterial. As said in Errington v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 110 F. 2d 384, 386, cert. denied 310 U.S. 638, 60 S.Ct. 1087, 84 L.Ed. 1407: “The alteration of an obligation of the United States with intent to defraud, which is penalized by the statute, need not be an alteration which destroys or impairs the validity of the obligation.” See also Foster v. U…