BORCHARD ET AL.

v.

CALIFORNIA BANK ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Deckert v. Independence Shares Corp., 311 U.S. 282 (U.S. 1940)
  …om and remanded the cause with directions to allow petitioners to amend their complaint to state a claim for a money judgment at law against Independence only. 108 F. 2d 51. We granted certiorari because of the importance of the questions presented. 309 U. S. 648. We believe that the appeals from the order granting the temporary injunction were not premature. It is true that § 128 of the Judicial Code (28 U. S. C. § 225) authorizes circuit courts of appeals to review only final decisions. But § 129 of the…
• Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Tr. Co., 311 U.S. 211 (U.S. 1940)
  …id that “the knowledge that' was not Gulick’s or was by him concealed is clear to Jardine and by him proclaimed.” It held the Jardine patent valid and infringed as it had found Gulick infringed in- its earlier decision. [*217] We granted certiorari, 309 U. S. 648, on a petition which raised, among others, the question whether the court of appeals had misinterpreted or unduly limited this Court’s earlier decision in this case and its decision in Permutit Co. v. Graver Corp., supra, by refusing to hold a paten…
• Collins v. Fed. Land Bank of ST. Paul, 119 F.2d 228 (8th Cir. 1941)
  …of the Act toward which Wright v. Union Central Life Insurance Co., 304 U.S. 502, 58 S.Ct. 1025, 82 L.Ed. 1490, John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Bartels, 308 U.S. 180, 60 S.Ct. 221, 84 L.Ed. 176, and Borchard v. California Bank & Trust Co., 309 U.S. 648, 60 S.Ct. 721, 84 L.Ed. 1000, point. Appellant was entitled, in the situation here presented, to have the real estate involved dealt with in the proceedings under section 75, on the same basis as if his deeds had been duly recorded. The court could…