WOODS, COURT TRUSTEE,

v.

INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO.; AND SAME V. GRANADA APARTMENTS, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B., 176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949)
  …92, 61 L.Ed. 442, L.R.A.1917F, 502, Ann. Cas.1917B, 1168; United States v. Shreveport Grain & Elevator Co., 287 U.S. 77, 83, 53 S.Ct. 42, 77 L.Ed. 175; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Federal Trade Commission, 6 Cir., 101 F. 2d 620, 624, cert. denied, 308 U.S. 557, 60 S.Ct. 74, 84 L.Ed. 468; Michigan Window Cleaning Co. v. Martino, 6 Cir., 173 F. 2d 466; Mesaba-Cliffs Mining Co. v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 174 F. 2d 857. The wording of § 2(11) is unambiguous, and no absurd or [*388] futile results nor unreasonab…
• Nat'l van Lines v. Dean, 237 F.2d 688 (9th Cir. 1956)
  …ether, if such were the case, it would defeat appellant’s claim of unfair competition, as distinguished from its claim of service mark infringement. Appellee cites Procter & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co., 3 Cir., 102 F. 2d 773, certiorari denied 308 U.S. 557, 60 S.Ct. 80, 84 L.Ed. 468, and Aunt Jemima Mills Co. v. Rigney & Co., 2 Cir., 247 F. 407, L.R.A.1918C, 1039, certiorari denied 245 U.S. 672, 38 S.Ct. 222, 62 L.Ed. 540, for the proposition that “estoppel by laches” precludes appellant from obtainin…
• Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Du Bois Brewing Co., 175 F.2d 370 (3d Cir. 1949)
  …hour, if it was not an actual abandonment of the exclusive right as far as DuBois was concerned. In Procter & Gamble Co. v. J. L. Prescott Co., 3 Cir., 1939, 102 F. 2d 773, at page 781, certiorari denied, J. L. Prescott Co. v. Procter & Gamble Co., 308 U.S. 557, 60 S.Ct. 80, 84 L.Ed. 468, this court expressly approved of a statement in Valvoline Oil Co. v. Havoline Oil Co., D.C.S.D. N.Y.1913, 211 F. 189, 195, which we deem particularly apropos to the case at bar: “But it cannot be equitable for a well-info…