JENKINS PETROLEUM PROCESS CO.

v.

SINCLAIR REPINING CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Weinberg v. United States, 126 F.2d 1004 (2d Cir. 1942)
  …nts generally operate to aid the United States Attorneys. Cooper v. O’Connor, 69 App.D.C. 100, 99 F. 2d 135, 139, 118 A.L.R. 1440, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 643, 59 S.Ct. 146, 83 L.Ed. 414, rehearing denied 305 U.S. 673, 59 S.Ct. 242, 83 L.Ed. 436; 307 U.S. 651, 59 S.Ct. 1035, 83 L.Ed. 1529, 1530; cf. 5 U.S.C.A. § 300a. The over-all administrative organization of the Department of Justice, therefore, achieves the same result as that in the Go-Bart case, supra, where the Court relied on a statutory provisio…
• Parker v. Sager, 174 F.2d 657 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
  …n successfully maintained. Sinclair Refining Co. v. Jenkins Petroleum Process Co., 1 Cir., 1938, 99 F. 2d 9, certiorari denied, 1939, 305 U.S. 659, 59 S.Ct. 362, 83 L.Ed. 427, rehearing denied, 1939, 306 U.S. 667, 59 S.Ct. 484, 83 L. Ed. 1062, 1939, 307 U.S. 651, 59 S.Ct. 1035, 83 L.Ed. 1530; Gordon v. Hut-chins, 1919, 118 Me. 6, 105 A. 356. Cf. Galt v. Phoenix Indemnity Co., 1941, 74 App.D.C. 156, 159, 120 F. 2d 723, 726. But in Sager v. Stamps, Sager did not successfully maintain the legal position in qu…