PARK & TILFORD IMPORT CORP.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Bath Iron Works Corp. & Commercial Union Cos. v. White, 584 F.2d 569 (1st Cir. 1978)
  …acking the Board’s decision in an attempt to enlarge his rights thereunder. Rule 4(a), Fed.R.App.P.; see Stockton v. Lucas, 482 F. 2d 979, 980 (Em.App.1973); Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. Cardillo, 102 F. 2d 299, 304 (1st Cir. 1939), cert. denied, 307 U.S. 645, 59 S.Ct. 1042, 83 L.Ed. 1525; 9 J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶¶ 204.02[l-2], 204.11[1 — 3] (1975).…
• Jung Hyun Sook v. Great Pac. Shipping Co. & Lasco Shipping Co., 632 F.2d 100 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …under American or Korean law. . See Universal Towing Co. v. Barrale, 595 F. 2d 414, 417 (8th Cir. 1979); Petition of Bloomfield Steamship Co., 422 F. 2d 728, 733 (2d Cir. 1970); The Quarrington Court, 102 F. 2d 916, 919 (2d Cir. 1939), cert. denied 307 U.S. 645, 59 S.Ct. 1043, 83 L.Ed. 1525 (1939); Petition of Canada S.S. Lines, 93 F.Supp. 549, 551 (N.D. Ohio 1950), aff’d 185 F. 2d 1019 (6th Cir. 1950); The Panuco, 47 F.Supp. 249, 250 (S.D.N.Y. 1942). . See Metropolitan Redwood Lumber Co. v. Doe, 223 U.S.…
• The Jarka Corp. v. Hughes, 299 F.2d 534 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …ere had been a change in conditions or mistake, so long as the findings of fact disclosed the theory of the new order and', it was supported by substantial evidence. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. v. Cardillo, 1 Cir., 1939, 102 F. 2d 299, cert. denied 307 U.S. 645, 59 S.Ct. 1042, 83 L.Ed. 1525. Here, however, the Deputy Commissioner has stated no reasons to support his modification of the 1952 order. The new order purports only to be made-“With respect to an application by the claimant, on the ground of a ch…