UNITED STATES
v.
ONE 1936 MODEL FORD V-8 DE LUXE COACH
UNITED STATES
ONE 1936 MODEL FORD V-8 DE LUXE COACH
305 U.S. 666
Supreme Court of the United States (1938)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Nowak, 448 F.2d 134 (7th Cir. 1971)…§ 8, cl. 1. Cf. Helvering v. Davis, 301 U. S. 619, 640, 57 S.Ct. 904, 81 L.Ed. 1307 (1937); First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n v. Loomis, 97 F. 2d 831, 839 (7th Cir. 1938), petition for cert. dismissed, Martin v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 305 U.S. 666, 59 S.Ct. 363, 83 L.Ed. 432 (1939); Langer v. United States, 76 F. 2d 817, 825 (8th Cir. 1935). Defendant contends, however, that because the United States no longer has a financial stake in FSLIC, it has become “a well organized private industry, s…1 / 3
-
United States v. State TAX Comm'n, 481 F.2d 963 (1st Cir. 1973)…Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Loomis, 97 F. 2d 831, 840 (7th Cir. 1938), cert. granted, 305 U.S. 564, 59 S.Ct. 92, 83 L. Ed. 355 (1938); dismissed on motion of counsel for petitioners sub nom. Martin v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass’n, 305 U.S. 666, 59 S.Ct. 363, 83 L.Ed. 432 (1938). See Fahey v. O’Melveny, 200 F. 2d 420 (9th Cir. 1952), cert. denied sub nom. Willhoit v. Fahey et al., 345 U.S. 952, 73 S.Ct. 866, 97 L.Ed. 1374 (1953). The federal associations are closely affiliated with their…