SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.

v.

LUNSFORD, ADMINISTRATRIX

Citator

Cited By

• Clark v. Memolo, 174 F.2d 978 (D.C. Cir. 1949)
  …us itself could not be issued.” It is clearly established that mandamus will lie only to compel the per- ' formance of an indisputable duty. United States ex rel. United States Borax Co. v. Ickes, 68 App.D.C. 399, 98 F. 2d271, 281, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 619, 59 S.Ct. 80, 83 L.Ed. 395, and cases cited. The only sentence known to the law is the sentence appearing on the records of the court. Should the record be inaccurate it may be corrected by appropriate motion. The judgment imports verity when colla…
• Clackamas Cnty. v. McKAY, 219 F.2d 479 (D.C. Cir. 1954)
  …discussions by Judge Vinson in United States ex rel. Roughton v. Ickes, 1938, 69 App.D.C. 324, 101 F. 2d 248, and Judge Stephens in United States ex rel. United States Borax Co. v. Ickes, 1938, 68 App.D.C. 399, 98 F. 2d 271, certiorari denied, 1938, 305 U.S. 619, 59 S.Ct. 80, 83 L.Ed. 395. . State ex rel. Holcombe v. Stone, 1936, 232 Ala. 16, 166 So. 602; Alberts v. McGirk, 1938, 51 Ariz. 510, 78 P. 2d 483; Golden v. McCarroll, 1938, 196 Ark. 443, 118 S.W. 2d 252; Palmer v. Fox, 1953, 118 Cal.App.2d 453, 2…
• United States v. Pollard, 115 F.2d 134 (5th Cir. 1940)
  …s action when lawful and authorized, is that of the court of his appointment. The judgment was right. It is affirmed. Schedule Al, Tide VHI, § 800 et seq., Rev.Act of 1926, 26 U.S.C.A. Int. Rev.Acts page 288. 95 Fed.2d 752, 754, certiorari denied 305 U.S. 619, 59 S.Ct. 79, 83 L.Ed. 395.…