BERKOWITZ
v.
ILLINOIS

U.S. | 1938-12-05
No. 463
305 U.S. 572 Supreme Court of the United States (1938) Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. Section 237 (a), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Farney v. Towle, 1 Black 350; Capital City Dairy Co. v. Ohio, 183 U. S. 238, 248; Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 86, 88; Mackesy v. Maine, ante, p. 570.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United Enters., Inc. v. Dubey, 128 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1942)
    …. 491, 86 L.Ed. — . California Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Reduction Works, 199 U.S. 306, 26 S.Ct. 100, 50 L.Ed. 204; House v. Mayes, 219 U.S. 270, 31 S.Ct. 234, 55 L.Ed. 213; Watch Tower Bible & Tract Society v. City of Bristol, D.C., 24 F.Supp. 57, 305 U.S. 572, 59 S.Ct. 246, 83 L.Ed. 361. Missouri Pacific R. Co. v. Humes, 115 U.S. 512, 520, 6 S.Ct. 110, 29 L.Ed. 463; Watson v. Maryland, 218 U.S. 173, 30 S.Ct. 644, 54 L.Ed. 987; Clason v. Indiana, 306 U.S. 439, 59 S.Ct. 609, 83 L.Ed. 858; In re Wilshire,…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw