CRANCER ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1938-11-07
No. 405
305 U.S. 567 Supreme Court of the United States (1938) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The decree is affirmed. Hooker v. Knapp, 225 U. S. 302; Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 283 U. S. 235, 238; Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. United States ex rel. Campbell, 289 U. S. 385, 388; United States v. Griffin, 303 U. S. 226, 233, 234.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Farley Terminal Co., Inc. v. The Atchison, 522 F.2d 1095 (9th Cir. 1975)
    …o initiate rates, and to adopt such policy of rate-making as it deems wise, subject to the revisory powers conferred upon the ICC. See Diamond Tank Transport v. United States, 23 F.Supp. 497, 501 (W.D. Wash., N.D.1938) (three-judge court), affirmed, 305 U.S. 567, 59 S.Ct. 149, 83 L.Ed. 357 (1938); United States v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 263 U.S. 515, 522, 44 S.Ct. 189, 68 L.Ed. 417 (1924). And in light of the congressional intention, already noted, that pre-existing agreements be abrogated by…
  • …26 F. 2d 281 (2 Cir. 1964). The right to terminate may, however, be waived or the landlord be estopped to assert the right. In re Wil-Low Cafeterias, 95 F. 2d 306, 115 A.L.R. 1184 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, Wil-Low Cafeterias v. 650 Madison Ave. Corp., 305 U.S. 567, 58 S.Ct. 950, 82 L.Ed. 1533 (1938), 4 Collier on Bankruptcy, pp. 1371-1372 (14th ed. 1962). Although the trial court concluded that the indenture trustees no longer had the power to terminate because of waiver and estoppel, estoppel more accuratel…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw