BRECHT CORPORATION

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Ideal TOY Corp. v. Sayco Doll Corp., 302 F.2d 623 (2d Cir. 1962)
  …ve the status quo where, in its sound discretion, the court deems the circumstances to justify.” 7 Moore j[ 62.05; see United States v. El-O-Pathic Pharmacy, 192 F. 2d 62 (9th Cir. 1951); Shinholt v. Angle, 90 F. 2d 297, 298 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 302 U.S. 719, 58 S.Ct. 40, 82 L.Ed. 555 (1937). Of course, absent an appeal, a district court has complete power over its interlocutory orders. John Simmons Co. v. Grier Bros., 258 U.S. 82, 42 S.Ct. 196, 66 L.Ed. 475 (1922); 7 Moore ¶ 60.16 [4]. And, absent an…
• The Brechteen Co. v. The United States, 854 F.2d 1301 (Fed. Cir. 1988)
  …o these findings being, for the most part, accurate. Compare the date of first importation, however, with the description of the imported merchandise and its mode of production in Brecht Corp. v. United States, 25 CCPA (Customs) 9, 11, cert. denied, 302 U.S. 719, 58 S.Ct. 39, 82 L.Ed. 555 (1937). The parties agree the issue we must decide is one of law: which tariff item fits the merchandise so described. It is only necessary to add a Webster’s Third New Int’l Dictionary (1966) definition of collagen: An i…