MASHUNKASHEY ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• The Schlegel Mfg. Co. v. USM Corp., 525 F.2d 775 (6th Cir. 1975)
  …he patent in suit. Field Body Corporation v. Highland Body Mfg. Co., 13 F. 2d 626 (6th Cir. 1926). Wadsworth Electric Mfg. Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co., 71 F. 2d 850 (6th Cir. 1934), certiorari denied Wadsworth Electric Mfg. Co. v. Sachs, 294 U.S. 724, 55 S.Ct. 552, 79 L.Ed. 1255. Thus, there are two focal points to the issue presently before the court: (1) the equivalency of the modified structures to the structures previously held infringing, and (2) the relationship of the new devices to the v…
• Hanson v. Hoffman, 113 F.2d 780 (10th Cir. 1940)
  …447, 451, 1 S.Ct. 389, 27 L.Ed. 226; St. Louis Smelting & Refining Co. v. Kemp, 104 U.S. 636, 647, 26 L.Ed. 875. Johnson v. Towsley, supra, 13 Wall. page 84, 20 L.Ed. 485; United States v. Mashunkashey, 10 Cir., 72 F. 2d 847, 851, certiorari denied 294 U.S. 724, 55 S.Ct. 551, 79 L.Ed. 1255. Johnson v. Towsley, supra, 13 Wall. page 87, 20 L.Ed. 485. Gonzales v. French, 164 U.S. 338, 342, 17 S.Ct. 102, 41 L.Ed. 548; Marquez v. Frisbie, 101 U.S. 473, 476, 25 L.Ed. 800; Moore v. Robbins, 96 U.S. 530, 535, 24…