SPRUILL

v.

CRAWFORD

Citator

Cited By

• Fisher v. Cap. Transit Co., 246 F.2d 666 (D.C. Cir. 1957)
  …n the contrary, the 1933 Act was formulated and passed with a definite understanding that the new company would be relieved of certain obligations. Cf. Hazen v. Washington Railway & Electric Co., 1934, 64 App.D.C. 57, 74 F. 2d 461, certiorari denied 294 U.S. 714, 55 S.Ct. 512, 79 L.Ed. 1247. Section 14 of the Unification Agreement provided that the merger was conditioned “upon the New Company being relieved from the expense of policemen at street railway crossings and intersections, the laying of new pave…
• Sturhahn v. Gen. Household Utils. Co., 92 F.2d 415 (5th Cir. 1937)
  …nce the record does not disclose the evidence upon which the ruling of the court may have been based, and which may have supported it, we cannot say that the court was in error. Spruill v. Crawford, 64 App.D.C. 118, 75 F.(2d) 522; certiorari denied, 294 U.S. 714, 55 S.Ct. 513, 79 L.Ed. 1247; Turner v. Board of Public Instruction (C.C.A.) 75 F.(2d) 147. It is urged that the legal conclusion upon which the judgment is based is shown [*416] by the opinion of the court to have been based upon facts set out in…