PITTSBURGH TERMINAL COAL CORP.

v.

BENNETT, ADMINISTRATRIX

Citator

Cited By

• Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n, Inc. v. Shoshone River Power, Inc., 874 F.2d 1346 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …Cir.) ([T]he obligation on the part of a buyer in a requirements contract to continue to have requirements without substantial variance is not to be implied more strictly than to impose upon him the obligation to act in good faith.”), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 617, 55 S.Ct. 210, 79 L.Ed. 706 (1934). Accord 1 A. Squillante & J. Fonesca, The Law of Modem Commercial Practices § 3.87 at 352 (rev. ed. 1981) (“Generally, the buyer in a requirements contract does not impliedly promise that he will have needs in or…
• Cal. State Bd. of Equalization v. Sierra Summit, Inc., 490 U.S. 844 (U.S. 1989)
  …in Howe v. Atlantic, Pacific & Gulf Oil Co., 4 F. Supp. 162 (WD Mo. 1933), that precipitated passage of the Act was reversed on state-law grounds even before the Act was signed into law. See Kansas City v. Johnson, 70 F. 2d 360 (CA8), cert. denied, 293 U. S. 617 (1934). “If the terms of the Louisiana statute had specifically provided for the levy of a tax against the trustee or receiver, there could be no doubt that the trustee would be liable for the franchise tax. There were controversies between state t…
• S. S. Kresge Co. v. Winget Kickernick Co., 96 F.2d 978 (8th Cir. 1938)
  …160, 30 S.Ct. 45, 54 L.Ed. 137; Stryker v. Goodnow's Administrator, 123 U.S. 527, 538, 540, 8 S.Ct. 203, 31 L.Ed. 194; Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. v. Williams, 8 Cir., 70 F. 2d 65, 67, certiorari denied Pittsburgh Terminal Coal Corp. v. Bennett, 293 U.S. 617, 55 S.Ct. 149, 79 L.Ed. 705; City of Shidler v. H. C. Speer & Sons Co., 10 Cir., 62 F. 2d 541, 518; N. O. Nelson Mfg. Co. v. F. E. Myers & Bro. Co., 6 Cir., 25 F. 2d 659, 666; Elliott Co. v. Roto Co., 2 Cir., 242 F. 941; Rowe v. Hill, 6 Cir., 215…