THE YULU ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Mrs. Harvey Stancill v. McKENZIE Tank Lines, Inc., 497 F.2d 529 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …accurate conclusion”, and that the facts upon which he bases his opinion must be disclosed to the jury. Gilbert v. Gulf Oil Corp., 4 Cir. 1949, 175 F. 2d 705, 709; Atlantic Life Ins. Co. v. Vaughan, 6 Cir. 1934, 71 F. 2d 394, 395-396, cert. denied, 293 U.S. 589, 55 S.Ct. 104, 79 L.Ed. 684. Thus, although the trial judge’s discretion to admit expert testimony is wide, it is not so expansive as to allow whim or conjecture to be received in the guise of expert analysis. See Gilbert v. Gulf Oil Corp., supra;…
• Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs OF Dade Cnty. v. Aerolineas Peruanasa, 307 F.2d 802 (5th Cir. 1962)
  …ther contracts, we give consideration to the intent of the parties so as to carryout their manifest purpose. Wright v. Henkel, 1903, 190 U.S. 40, 23 S.Ct. 781, [*807] 47 L.Ed. 948; The Yulu, 5 Cir., 1934, 71 F. 2d 635, cert. den., The Yulu v. U. S., 293 U.S. 589, 55 S.Ct. 104, 79 L.Ed. 684; and Hidalgo County Water Control & Imp. Dist., etc. v. Hedrick, 5 Cir., 1955, 226 F. 2d 1. We proceed also under the admonition that where a treaty admits of two constructions, one restrictive of and the other favorable…
• Hidalgo Cnty. Water Control & Improvement Dist. NO. 7 v. Wyatt C. Hedrick, 226 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1955)
  …presented. The rule for construction of treaties has been thus stated: “Treaties are to be construed as other contracts according to the intent of the parties.” The Yulu, 5 Cir., 1934, 71 F. 2d 635, 636, certiorari denied The Yulu v. United States, 293 U.S. 589, 55 S.Ct. 104, 79 L.Ed. 684. Cited in the case of The Yulu is Wright v. Henkel, 190 U.S. 40, 23 S.Ct. 781, 785, 47 L.Ed. 948, where it is held that “Treaties must receive a fair interpretation, according to the intention of the contracting parties,…