CHESAPEAKE & DELAWARE STEAMBOAT CO.

v.

TUG PENNSYLVANIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• O/Y Finlayson-Forssa A/B v. PAN Atl. S.S. Corp., 259 F.2d 11 (5th Cir. 1958)
  …alf the distance she could see. A. H. Bull S.S. Co. v. United States, 2 Cir., 34 F. 2d 614, 1929 A.M.C. 1175; The Lillian Anne-Pennsylvania, 2 Cir., 1934 A. M.C. 569, certiorari denied Chesapeake & Delaware Steamboat Company v. The Tug Pennsylvania, 293 U.S. 575, 55 S.Ct. 86, 79 L.Ed. 673, 1934 A.M.C. 1410; The Goldshell-White Plains, 2 Cir., 224 F. 2d 86, 1955 A.M.C. 1438; Marsden’s Collisions at Sea, 10th Ed. 1953, p. 479-480. It has been well put: “That is to say, it is the duty of a vessel to proceed in…
• United States v. Kaplan, 267 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …with Annie’s money. The burden of proof rested upon the Government affirmatively to establish that the conveyances were made without a fair consideration. Strongin v. International Acceptance Bank, 2 Cir., 1934, 70 F. 2d 248, 252, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 575, 55 S.Ct. 86, 79 L.Ed. 673; In re Goodman, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1932, 5 F.Supp. 517, 518; Henry v. First National Bank, Sup., 1951, 110 N.Y.S.2d 115; Fox v. Sizeland, 1938, 170 Misc. 390, 9 N.Y.S.2d 350. It is true, as the Government points out, that the D…