WINGERT ET AL.
v.
SMEAD ET AL.

U.S. | 1934-10-08
No. 97
293 U.S. 567 Supreme Court of the United States (1934) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • FOX et ux. v. Ickes, 137 F.2d 30 (D.C. Cir. 1943)
    …t. 26, 69 L.Ed. 219. Kittitas Reclamation District, et al. v. Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District, et al., pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Moore v. Anderson, 1933, 68 F. 2d 191, cert. den. 1934, 293 U.S. 567, 55 S.Ct. 78, 79 L.Ed. 666.…
  • In re ROE, 87 F.2d 693 (2d Cir. 1937)
    …than four years after adjudication. Still,. we possess no discretion to entertain an appeal not taken in accordance with the statute. Compliance therewith is jurisdictional. Wingert et al. v. Smead et al., 70 F. (2d) 351 (C.C.A.4), certiorari denied 293 U.S. 567, 55 S.Ct. 77, 79 L.Ed. 666. Leave to appeal was not granted, and the appeal must accordingly be dismissed. Appeal dismissed.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw