AUSTIN ET AL.
v.
COE, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS

U.S. | 1934-10-08
No. 65
293 U.S. 561 Supreme Court of the United States (1934) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Spanos v. Skouras Theatres Corp., 364 F.2d 161 (2d Cir. 1966)
    …lawfully performed without his being admitted to the New York bar and cannot be considered an illegal bargain. Such is the holding of Tuppela v. Mathison, 291 F. 728 (9 Cir. 1923), and Cochran v. Burdick, 63 App.D.C. 150, 70 F. 2d 754, cert. denied, 293 U.S. 561, 55 S.Ct. 73, 79 L.Ed. 661 (1934). See also In re Waring’s Estate, 47 N.J. 367, 221 A. 2d 193 (1966). Cf. 56-70 58th St. Holding Corp. v. Fedders-Quigan Corp., 5 N.Y.2d 557, 186 N.Y.S.2d 583, 159 N.E. 2d 150 (1959) ; Cochran v. Hurth, 29 Ohio Ap…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw