FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK
v.
D. N. MORRISON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK
D. N. MORRISON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
293 U.S. 534
Supreme Court of the United States (1935)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Parsons v. Federal Realty Corp., 105 Fla. 105; 143 So. 912; Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Hilton-Green, 241 U. S. 613, 623; American Fire Ins. Co. v. King Lumber Co., 250 U. S. 2, 10-11, 13-14; Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 172 U. S. 557, 565-566; National Ins. Co. v. Wanberg, 260 U. S. 71, 73 et seq.; Stipcich v. Insurance Co., 277 U. S. 311, 320; Merchants Liability Co. v. Smart, 267 U. S. 126, 129; Hancock Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Warren, 181 U. S. 73, 76-77; O’Gorman & Young v. Hartford Ins. Co., 282 U. S. 251, 257.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ideal Foods, Inc. v. Action Leasing Corp., 413 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)…ance upon that representation by a third person, and (3) a change of position by the third person in reliance upon such representation. Fidelity and Casualty Co. v. D. N. Morrison Construction Co., 116 Fla. 66, 156 So. 385 (1934), appeal dismissed, 293 U.S. 534, 55 S.Ct. 348, 79 L.Ed. 642 (1935); H. S. A., Inc. v. Harris-In-Hollywood, Inc., 285 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), cert. dismissed, 290 So. 2d 493 (Fla.1974). In the present case, Maru had been working solely at Ideal’s subsidiary for approximate…
-
Benson v. Seestrom, 409 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)…authority or agency by estoppel, it is a prerequisite that the principal do something that induces reasonable reliance on his agent’s acts. Fidelity Casualty Co. v. D. N. Morrison Construction Co., 116 Fla. 66, 156 So. 385 (1934), appeal dismissed, 293 U.S. 534, 55 S.Ct. 348, 79 L.Ed. 642. The appellant did nothing to create an appearance that the counteroffer could merely be responded to in a reasonable time after notification. In fact, she made a substantial effort to negate this assumption. The written…
-
Sec. Union Title Ins. Co. v. Citibank (Florida), N.A., 715 So. 2d 973 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…position by a third party who in good faith relies on such representations or actions. Id. at 421-22 (citations omitted)(emphasis added). In Fidelity & Cas. Co. v. D.N. Morrison Constr. Co., 116 Fla. 66, 156 So. 385, 387 (1934), appeal dismissed, 293 U.S. 534, 55 S.Ct. 348, 79 L.Ed. 642 (1935), the Florida Supreme Court stated that the principle of apparent authority embraces the following three elements: 1) a representation by the principal, 2) reliance on that representation by a third person, and 3) a…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Stipcich v. Metro. Life Ins. Co., 277 U.S. 311 (U.S. 1928)
- Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Hilton-Green, 241 U.S. 613 (U.S. 1916)
- Orient Ins. Co. v. Daggs, 1899 U.S. LEXIS 2386 (U.S. 1869)
- O'Gorman and Young v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 282 U.S. 251 (U.S. 1931)
- Parsons v. Fed. Realty Corp., 105 Fla. 105 (Fla. 1931)
- Am. Fire Ins. Co. v. King Lumber & Mfg. Co., 250 U.S. 2 (U.S. 1919)
- Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Wanberg, 260 U.S. 71 (U.S. 1922)
- Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Warren, 181 U.S. 73 (U.S. 1901)
- Merchs. Mut. Auto. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Smart, 267 U.S. 126 (U.S. 1925)