CATTERLIN

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• Hall v. People of State of Cal., 79 F.2d 132 (9th Cir. 1935)
  …ourt of the United States, but was dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question, and for the reason that the decision of the Supreme Court of California was based upon nonfederal grounds adequate to support it. Hall v. California, 292 U. S. 614, 54 S. Ct. 869, 78 L. Ed. 1473. Thereafter appellant filed in the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California his petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that, in the proceedings had against him in the superio…
• United States ex rel. Edgar I. Shott, Jr. v. Tehan, 365 F.2d 191 (6th Cir. 1966)
  …; Commonwealth v. Freed, 106 Pa.Super. 529, 162 A. 679 (1932); Nelson v. State, 355 P. 2d 413 (Okl.Cr.1960); Catterlin v. State, 16 Ohio Law Abst. 410 (1939), appeal dismissed for want of substantial federal question, 128 Ohio St. 110, 190 N.E. 578; 292 U.S. 614, 54 S.Ct. 868, 78 L.Ed. 1473, citing Morrison v. People of State [*195] of California, 291 U.S. 82, 88-91, 54 S.Ct. 281, 78 L.Ed. 664; Casey v. United States, 276 U.S. 413, 418, 48 S.Ct. 373, 72 L.Ed. 632; Mugler v. State of Kansas, 123 U.S. 623, 67…
• Oneida OF the Thames Band v. State OF NEW York, 771 F.2d 51 (2d Cir. 1985)
  …ourt,” Sup.Ct.R. 17.1(c), a circumstance that has led to a grant of certiorari because of conflict with a subsequent decision of the Supreme Court. See, e.g., GAP Corp. v. Cheng, — U.S. ---, 105 S.Ct. 3493, 87 L.Ed.2d 626 (1985); Helvering v. Wiese, 292 U.S. 614, 54 S.Ct. 862, 78 L.Ed. 1473 (1934); see also R. Stern & E. Gressman, Supreme Court Practice § 4.5 (4th ed. 1969). Yet we also note that this circumstance is included in a list stated in the Rule to be "neither controlling nor fully measuring the…

Authorities Cited

• Mugler v. Kansas. Same V. Same, 123 U.S. 623 (U.S. 1887)
• Casey v. United States, 276 U.S. 413 (U.S. 1928)
• Morrison v. California, 291 U.S. 82 (U.S. 1934)