RALPH SOLLITT & SONS CONSTRUCTION CO.
v.
VIRGINIA

U.S. | 1934-04-02
No. 857
292 U.S. 599 Supreme Court of the United States (1934) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Ohio River Contract Co. v. Gordon, 244 U.S. 68, 71, 72; Gromer v. Standard Dredging Co., 224 U.S. 362, 371, 372; Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U.S. 308, 311; Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U.S. 29; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U.S. 191; American Baseball Club v. Philadelphia, 290 U.S. 595.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bank OF N.C., N.A. v. The Rock Island Bank, 570 F.2d 202 (7th Cir. 1978)
    …Illinois banks within the limits expressly authorized by the legislature. State Bank of Blue Island v. Benzing, 383 Ill. 40, 48 N.E. 2d 333, 339 (1943); Knass v. Madison & Kedzie State Bank, 354 Ill. 554, 561, 188 N.E. 836 (1933), appeal dismissed, 292 U.S. 599, 54 S.Ct. 632, 78 L.Ed. 1463 (1934). Having done so, I would hold that the issuance of Rock Island’s instrument was not authorized by the Illinois Banking Act because, even if it is a “letter of credit” under the Commercial Code, it is not one aut…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw