SILSBY
v.
LOUISIANA
SILSBY
LOUISIANA
292 U.S. 599
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied. The appeal is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Section 237 (a) Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937). Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari as required by § 237 (c) Judicial Code as amended (43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bank OF N.C., N.A. v. The Rock Island Bank, 570 F.2d 202 (7th Cir. 1978)…Illinois banks within the limits expressly authorized by the legislature. State Bank of Blue Island v. Benzing, 383 Ill. 40, 48 N.E. 2d 333, 339 (1943); Knass v. Madison & Kedzie State Bank, 354 Ill. 554, 561, 188 N.E. 836 (1933), appeal dismissed, 292 U.S. 599, 54 S.Ct. 632, 78 L.Ed. 1463 (1934). Having done so, I would hold that the issuance of Rock Island’s instrument was not authorized by the Illinois Banking Act because, even if it is a “letter of credit” under the Commercial Code, it is not one aut…