MONTANA ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.

U.S. | 1933-11-13
No. 222
290 U.S. 593 Supreme Court of the United States (1933) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

Decree [*594] affirmed.

United States v. Louisiana, ante, p. 70. Mr. Raymond T. Nagle, Attorney General of Montana, and Mr. Francis A. Silver were on the brief for appellants. Solicitor General Biggs and Messrs. Elmer B. Collins, Daniel W. Knowlton, and Edward Ml Reidy were on the brief for the United States and Interstate Commerce Commission, appellees. Messrs. M. L. Countryman, Jr., D. F. Lyons,' J. N. Davis, Walter McFarland, J. M. Souby-, Conrad Olson, and F. G. Dorety were on the brief for the railway companies, appellees. Messrs. John E. Benton and Clyde S. Bailey, by leave of Court, filed a brief on behalf of the National Association of Railroad and Utilities Commissioners, as amicus curiae.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 293 U.S. 454 (U.S. 1935)
    …U. S. 776, 779; Louisiana Public Service Comm’n v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., 284 U. S. 125, 132; Rlinois Commerce Comm’n v. United States, 292 U. S. 474, 481-483; Ohio v. United States, 292 U. S. 498, 511; Montana v. United States, 2 F. Supp. 448, aff’d 290 U. S. 593; Kentucky v. United States, 3 F. Supp. 778. See, too, New York v. United States, 257 U. S. 591, 600. The original Act of February 4, 1887, c. 104, § 14, 24 Stat. 384, which had prescribed that the report should “ include findings of fact upon which…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw