BABCOCK ET AL.

v.

CHICAGO RAILWAYS CO. ET AL.; TYLER ET AL. V. SAME; AND RILEY ET AL. V. SAME

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Silliman, 167 F.2d 607 (3d Cir. 1948)
  …elease of a joint tortfeasor. United States v. Rodiek, 2 Cir., 1941, 117 F. 2d 588. 1942, 315 U.S. 783, 62 S.Ct. 793, 86 L.Ed. 1190. Lovejoy v. Murray, 1865, 3 Wall. 1, 18 L.Ed. 129; Lewis v. Ingram, 10 Cir., 1932, 57 F. 2d 463, 1932, cert. denied 287 U.S. 614, 53 S.Ct. 16, 77 L.Ed. 533; see II Freeman, Judgments (1925) § 573; Restatement, Judgments (1942) § 94; Notes, 65 A.L.R. 1087 (1930), 27 A.L. R. 805 (1923). The rule in England was formerly to the contrary. Morton’s Case [1584], Cro. Eliz. 30; Cocke…
• Citizens Banking Co. v. Monticello State Bank, 143 F.2d 261 (8th Cir. 1944)
  …tings, 144 U.S. 136, 140, 12 S.Ct. 662, 36 L.Ed. 378; Irvine v. Dunham, 111 U.S. 327, 334, 4 S.Ct. 501, 28 L.Ed. 444; City of Jacksonville v. Bankers Life Co., 7 Cir., 90 F. 2d 141, 144; Lewis v. Ingram, 10 Cir., 57 F. 2d 463, 466, certiorari denied 287 U.S. 614, 53 S.Ct. 16, 77 L.Ed. 533; Ingram v. Lewis, 10 Cir., 37 F. 2d 259, 260, 70 A.L.R. 702, certiorari denied 282 U.S. 842, 51 S.Ct. 22, 75 L.Ed. 747). That the relief asked is in money does not affect the right of the beneficiaries to proceed in equity…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Wash. Loan & Tr. Co. v. Colby, 108 F.2d 743 (D.C. Cir. 1939)
  …trustees default or permit a trust estate to be wasted through their negligence, they may be held to forfeit any commissions or fees that have been paid them during their trusteeship.”; Lewis v. Ingram, 10 Cir., 57 F. 2d 463, 465, certiorari denied, 287 U.S. 614; 2 Scott, Trusts (1939) § 243; Restatement, Trusts (1935) § 243; Note, 110 A.L.R. 566.…