UNITED STATES EX REL. JACKSON

v.

MEYERING, SHERIFF

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. McNINCH, 242 F.2d 359 (4th Cir. 1957)
  …is not the government or a department or officer of it”. See also Pierce v. United States, 314 U.S. 306, 62 S.Ct. 237, 86 L.Ed. 226 and Lindgren v. United States Shipping Board Merchant Fleet Corporation, 4 Cir., 55 F. 2d 117, 120, certiorari denied 286 U.S. 542, 52 S.Ct. 499, 76 L.Ed. 1280. In the case last cited this court said: “Plaintiff contends, however, that this suit and the former suit are virtually against the same defendant because the United States owns the stock of the Fleet Corporation and th…
• Smith v. State OF Idaho & Paul W. Bright, 373 F.2d 149 (9th Cir. 1967)
  …52 L.Ed. 1113 (1908). See also Hogan v. O’Neill, 255 U.S. 52, 55, 41 S.Ct. 222, 65 L.Ed. 497 (1921); Brown v. Fitzgerald, 39 F. 2d 870, 872 (9th Cir. 1930); United States ex rel. Jackson v. Meyering, 54 F. 2d 621, 622 (7th Cir. 1931), cert. denied, 286 U.S. 542, 52 S.Ct. 498, 76 L.Ed. 1280 (1932); Person v. Morrow, 108 F. 2d 838, 840 (10th Cir. 1940). Appellant’s final contention is that there is no showing in the record that an agent of the demanding state appeared within thirty days of appellant’s arres…
• Stumpf v. Matthews, 195 F.2d 35 (D.C. Cir. 1952)
  …ity, for it was permissible to establish a particular date by evidence, as the State 'did. We think this to be the necessary .conclusion to be drawn from United States ex rel. Jackson v. Meyering, 7 Cir., 1931, 54 F. 2d 621, certiorari denied, 1932, 286 U.S. 542, 52 S.Ct. 498, 76 L.Ed. 1280; Hayes v. Palmer, 1903, 21 App. D.C. 450; Hyatt v. People of State of New York ex rel. Corkran, 1903, 188 U.S. 691, 23 S.Ct. 456, 47 L.Ed. 657. See also [*37] Strassheim v. Daily, 1911, 221 U.S. 280, 31 S.Ct. 558, 55 L.E…