KERR GLASS MFG. CORP.
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY ET AL.
KERR GLASS MFG. CORP.
SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY ET AL.
286 U.S. 532
Supreme Court of the United States (1932)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. Manhattan Life Insurance Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 134; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari (§ 237 (c), Judicial Code as amended, 43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied. Mr. Samuel B. Bassett for appellees.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (U.S. 1951)…ent, bearing little relation in their minds to any substantial threat to the safety of the community. Such also is true of cases like Fiske v. Kansas, 274 U. S. 380 (1927), and De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U. S. 353 (1937); but cf. Lazar v. Pennsylvania, 286 U. S. 532 (1932).( They. were not confronted with any situation comparable to the instant one — the development of an apparatus designed and dedicated to the overthrow of the Government, in the context of world crisis after crisis. Chief Judge Learned Hand,…
-
MAS v. Orange-Crush Co., 99 F.2d 675 (4th Cir. 1938)…Bros. Co., 6 Cir., 46 F. 2d 870; Liquid Veneer Corp. v. Smuckler, 9 Cir., 90 F. 2d 196; United States v. Pacific Forwarding Co., D.C., 8 F.Supp. 647; State ex rel. Kerr Glass Mfg. Corp. v. Superior Court, 166 Wash. 41, 6 P. 2d 368, certiorari denied 286 U.S. 532, 52 S.Ct. 640, 76 L.Ed. 1273. It is also clear that J. L. Cummings' was a representative of the defendant cor-> poration of sufficient rank to justify the service of process upon him under the state law. Section 6064 of the Virginia Code provides…1 / 2
-
Chubb v. Washington, 293 U.S. 520 (U.S. 1934)…Per Curiam: The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. Kerr Glass Mfg. Corp. v. Superior Court, 286 U. S. 532; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 700; Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co., 252 U. S. 341, 344; Cleveland & Pittsburgh R. Co. v. Cleveland, 235 U. S. 50, 53; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 134; Chap…
Authorities Cited
- Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Cohen, 234 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1914)
- Hiawassee River Power Co. v. Carolina-Tennessee Power Co., 252 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1920)
- Cleveland & Pittsburgh R.R. Co. v. City of Cleveland, 235 U.S. 50 (U.S. 1914)
- White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex rel. Applegate, 279 U.S. 692 (U.S. 1929)