CZARLINSKY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Feldman, 136 F.2d 394 (2d Cir. 1943)
  …atute testimony obtained in litigation in a state court is competent evidence in a federal prosecution. See United States v. Hughes, Fed. Cas.No. 15,417, 12 Blatch. 553, 559; Czarlinsky v. United States, 10 Cir., 54 F. 2d 889, 893, certiorari denied 285 U.S. 549, 52 S.Ct. 406, 76 L.Ed. 940; Johnson v. United States, 1 Cir., 163 F. 30, 32, 18 L.R.A.,N.S., 1194. Moreover, even if the federal privilege against self-incrimination extended to compulsory testimony in state courts, the record here fails to show w…
• E. F. Prichard Co. v. Consumers Brewing Co., 136 F.2d 512 (6th Cir. 1943)
  …ting business. Continental Corp. v. National Union Radio Corp., 7 Cir., 67 F. 2d 938; Ward Baking Co. v. Potter-Wrightington, Inc., 1 Cir., 298 F. 398; Lawrence-Williams Co. v. Societe Enfants Gombault et Cie, 6 Cir., 52 F. 2d 774 certiorari denied, 285 U.S. 549, 52 S.Ct. 406, 76 L.Ed 940; Andrew Jergens Co. v. Bonded Products Corp., D.C., 13 F. 2d 417, certiorari denied, 275 U.S. 572, 48 S.Ct. 204, 72 L.Ed. 432. Otherwise stated, there is no property in a trade [*519] mark except as a right appurtenant to…