ERIE R. CO.
v.
DIDSBURY
ERIE R. CO.
DIDSBURY
285 U.S. 540
Supreme Court of the United States (1932)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Laurent v. Anderson, 70 F.2d 819 (6th Cir. 1934)…“That the actual owner of the stock may be held for the assessment, although his name does not appear upon the transfer books of the hank, is well settled.” • A trust [Corker v. Soper, 53 F.(2d) 190 (C. C. A. 5), certiorari denied Corker v. Howard, 285 U. S. 540, 52 S. Ct. 313, 76 L. Ed. [*824] 933] may not be employed to evade double liability. It was said in Lewin on Trusts (13th Ed.) p. 113: “The court will not permit the system of trusts to be directed to any object that contravenes the policy of the la…