WHITMER
v.
LUCAS, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, ET AL.

U.S. | 1932-03-28
No. 717
285 U.S. 529 Supreme Court of the United States (1932) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 285 U.S. 534
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The petition for writ of certiorari in this cause is granted. On consideration of the suggestion of the United States that this cause has abated, it is ordered that the decrees of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit' and of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois in this cause, be, and! the same are hereby, vacated, and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the proceeding as abated. United States ex rel. Claussen v. Curran, 276 U. S. 590; Matheus v. United States ex rel. Cunningham, 282 U. S. 802. Solicitor General Thacher and Mr. W. Marvin Smith for respondents.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Maison v. Confederated Tribes OF the Umatilla Indian Reservation, 314 F.2d 169 (9th Cir. 1963)
    …v. Washington, supra.], a restriction of the fishing activities of other citizens of a state is valid if merely reasonable, as required by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Thomson v. Dana, 52 F. 2d 759 (D.Ore.1931), aff’d. 285 U.S. 529, 52 S.Ct. 409, 76 L.Ed. 925 (1932). The complete exclusion of sports fishermen from the spawning grounds as an alternative does not amount to arbitrary discrimination against them, because the state possesses broader power to regulate sports fishing…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw