EX PARTE KOSOLAPOV

U.S. | 1932-01-11
284 U.S. 592 Supreme Court of the United States (1932) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …. Dumore Co., 282 U. S. 813; Adam v. New York Trust Co., 282 U. S. 814; Director of Lands v. Villa-Abrille, 283 U. S. 785; Sanchez v. Borras, 283 U. S. 798; Elgin, Joliet & E. R. Co. v. Churchill, 284 U. S. 589; Snowden v. Red River Drainage Dist., 284 U. S. 592; Lang v. United States, 286 U. S. 523; Franklin-American Trust Co. v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 286 U. S. 533; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Parker, 287 U. S. 569; Sevier Commission Co. v. Wallowa Nat. Bank, 287 U. S. 575; Fort Smith Sub. R. Co…
  • …al federal question, upon the strength of Sugg v. Thornton (1889) 132 U.S. 524, 10 S.Ct. 163, 33 L.Ed. 447, and United Mine Workers v. Coronado Coal Co. (1922) 259 U.S. 344, 42 S.Ct. 570, 66 L.Ed. 975, 27 A.L.R. 762. Jardine v. Superior Court (1932) 284 U.S. 592, 52 S.Ct. 197, 76 L.Ed. 510. The pertinency of this decision is apparent, for a state may no more deprive a person, natural or artificial, of property without due process of law by means of a statute than it may in absence of statute. Hence if a st…
  • Wagner v. Leenhouts, 287 U.S. 571 (U.S. 1932)
    …n is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment of the state court here sought to be reviewed was based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Arneson v. United Irrigation Co., 284 U. S. 592, 593; Potter v. Maybury, 284 U. S. 593, 594; Ellison Ranching Co. v. Bartlett, 284 U. S. 598.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw