PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 14 OF CHICAGO ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1931-11-02
No. 41
284 U.S. 582 Supreme Court of the United States (1931) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

Decree affirmed. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. Deering, 254 U. S. 443; United States v. Brims, 272 U. S. 549; Bedford Cut Stone Co. v. Journeymen Stone Cutters’ Assn., 274 U. S. 37.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Nat'l Woodwork Mfrs. Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 386 U.S. 612 (U.S. 1967)
    …pe described above. A refusal to install stone that had not been cut by union labor was held an illegal secondary boycott in Bedford Cut Stone Co. v. Journeymen Stone Cutters’ Assn., 274 U. S. 37. Then in Painters District Council v. United States, 284 U. S. 582, the Court on the authority of Bedford Cut Stone affirmed a decision holding that a product boycott for work preservation purposes was an illegal secondary boycott. The case' involved a refusal to install prefinished kitchen cabinets by workmen who…
    1 / 2

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw