WALNUT & QUINCE STREETS CORP.
v.
MILLS, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, ET AL.

U.S. | 1931-10-19
No. 105
284 U.S. 573 Supreme Court of the United States (1931) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
*Per Curiam:

*Per Curiam:

The appeal herein 'is' dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash Ry. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • W. Va. State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (U.S. 1943)
    …some Protestant persuasions may rightly object to having their children exposed? On the other hand the religious consciences of some parents may rebel at the absence of any Bible-reading in the schools. See Washington ex rel. Clithero v. Showalter, 284 U. S. 573. Or is this Court to enter the old controversy between science and religion by unduly defining the limits within which a state may experiment with its school curricula? The religious consciences of some parents may be offended by subjecting their ch…
  • Rko-Stanley Warner Theatres, Inc. v. Mellon Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co., 436 F.2d 1297 (3d Cir. 1970)
    …does not interfere with the public easement or constitute a public nuisance, and subject to power in the state to regulate or forbid altogether for the public benefit. See Walnut & Quince St. Corp. v. Mills, 303 Pa. 25, 154 A. 29, appeal dismissed, 284 U.S. 573, 52 S.Ct. 16, 76 L.Ed. 498 (1931). See generally 10 E. McQuillen, Municipal Corporations, § 30.92 (3d ed. 1966). . RKO’s claim is more than a claim for an easement to light and air, which can be acquired by express grant but not by prescription. Se…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw