WINGERT ET AL., EXECUTORS,
v.
HAGERSTOWN BANK ET AL.
WINGERT ET AL., EXECUTORS,
HAGERSTOWN BANK ET AL.
283 U.S. 832
Supreme Court of the United States (1931)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ex parte Nunez. Carr v. Nunez, 93 F.2d 41 (9th Cir. 1937)…only to a determination that the “warrant was not arbitrarily issued, or issued as the result of an unfair hearing.” Kenmotsu v. Nagle, Immigra [*42] tion Com’r (C.C.A.9, 1930) 44 F. 2d 953, 955, certiorari denied (1930) Sadaichi Kenmotsu v. Nagle, 283 U.S. 832, 51 S.Ct. 365, 75 L.Ed. 1444. It cannot be said that-the warrant in this proceeding was arbitrarily issued or that the hearing was unfair to the petitioner. From an opinion brought to us in a supplement to the transcript we are acquainted with the t…
-
Taube v. John Ingraham in Bankr. of Mace-Ryer Appliance & Furniture Co., 290 F.2d 288 (8th Cir. 1961)…ed, Bridges must prevail over plaintiffs.” The next case dealing with Missouri law and cited by the trial court is from this court, In re Bell Motor Co., 8 Cir., 1930, 45 F. 2d 19, certiorari denied Craig [*293] v. Industrial Acceptance Corporation, 283 U.S. 832, 51 S.Ct. 365, 75 L.Ed. 1445, upon which appellants place considerable reliance. Therein the court stated, 45 F. 2d at page 24: “If, as held by many of the authorities, the trust receipts created a bailment, the title being vested in the Industrial…