NASHVILLE, CHATTANOOGA & ST. LOUIS RY. CO.
v.
CARROLL COUNTY ET AL.
NASHVILLE, CHATTANOOGA & ST. LOUIS RY. CO.
CARROLL COUNTY ET AL.
283 U.S. 785
Supreme Court of the United States (1931)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. New York ex rel. Hatch v. Reardon, 204 U. S. 152, 160; Hooker v. Burr, 194 U. S. 415; Ohio v. Akron Park District, 281 U. S. 74, 81.
Mr. Fitzgerald Hall for appellant.
Mr. Joseph, W. Byms for appellees.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rice v. Sioux City Mem'l Park Cemetery, Inc., 349 U.S. 70 (U.S. 1955)…nglo & London-Paris Nat. Bank v. Consolidated Nat. Bank, 280 U. S. 526; Gulf, Mobile & N. R. Co. v. Williams, ibid.; Wisconsin Electric Co. v. Dumore Co., 282 U. S. 813; Adam v. New York Trust Co., 282 U. S. 814; Director of Lands v. Villa-Abrille, 283 U. S. 785; Sanchez v. Borras, 283 U. S. 798; Elgin, Joliet & E. R. Co. v. Churchill, 284 U. S. 589; Snowden v. Red River Drainage Dist., 284 U. S. 592; Lang v. United States, 286 U. S. 523; Franklin-American Trust Co. v. St. Louis Union Trust Co., 286 U. S.…
Authorities Cited
- NEW York v. Reardon, 204 U.S. 152 (U.S. 1907)
- Ohio ex rel. Bryant v. Akron Metro. Park Dist., 281 U.S. 74 (U.S. 1930)
- Hooker v. Burr, 194 U.S. 415 (U.S. 1904)