MARSHALL HALL MILLING CO. ET AL.

v.

MEXICAN-AMERICAN FRUIT & STEAMSHIP CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau v. United States, 433 F.2d 212 (8th Cir. 1970)
  …d reparations. In the Chase case itself, the Commission found that the carriers had complied with its order and refused reparations. The carriers also cite Chicago, I. & L. Ry. Co. v. International Milling Co., 43 F. 2d 93 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 282 U.S. 885, 51 S.Ct. 89, 75 L.Ed. 781 (1930), decided by our Circuit. The case is of doubtful relevance to this situation, but to the extent that it is relevant it also is contrary to the carriers’ position. There the carriers apparently had on file two tariff…
• Atchison v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 607 F.2d 1199 (7th Cir. 1979)
  …R. & S. M. Co., 374 F.Supp. 24, 26 (W.D.Okla.1974), where the court noted further that “Public Policy demands strict performance of the tariff . . .” . Cf. Chicago I. & L. Ry. Co. v. International Milling Co., 43 F. 2d 93, 96 (8 Cir.) cert. denied, 282 U.S. 885, 51 S.Ct. 89, 75 L.Ed. 781 (1930). . The Economic Regulation of Business and Industry: A Legislative History of U.S. Regulatory Agencies, p. 294 (B. Schwartz ed. 1973). Reprinted portion of the House of Representatives’ debate; 49th Congress, 1st S…