APPLICATION OF BRUCE M. MORGAN FOR ADMISSION TO THE FLORIDA BAR

Fla. | 1965-02-17
No. 34068
DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
171 So. 2d 535 Florida Supreme Court (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Supreme Court referred Bruce M. Morgan's application for admission to The Florida Bar to the Board of Bar Examiners for an investigation into his character and fitness. The Board was authorized to require a deposit to cover investigation costs.


Holding

The Court held that an investigation into Morgan's character and fitness subsequent to his 1949 certification was necessary before admission to the bar.


Key Quotes

“Upon consideration of the application of Bruce M. Morgan directed to the Florida Board of Bar Examiners stating that he had received certificate to practice in Florida from the State Board of Law Examiners of Florida dated October 11, 1949, and further stating that he had never taken the oath of attorney and desired to take said oath and be admitted as a member of The Florida Bar, it is Ordered that the application of the said Bruce M. Morgan, together with the files of the State Board of Bar Examiners relative to his application for admission, be and the same are hereby referred to the Florida Board of Bar Examiners with directions that said Board conduct an investigation and inquire into and determine the character, fitness and general qualifications for admission to The Florida Bar by the said Morgan, such investigation to cover the period subsequent to the 11th day of October, 1949, and to report to this Court the results of such investigation and its recommendations with respect to said application as early as practicable.”

This quote outlines the core order of the court, referring the application for a character and fitness investigation.

Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Bruce M. Morgan applied for admission to The Florida Bar, stating he received a certificate to practice in 1949 but had never taken the oath. He reque…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the application of Bruce M. Morgan directed to the Florida Board of Bar Examiners stating that he had received certificate to practice in Florida from the State Board of Law Examiners of Florida dated October 11, 1949, and further stating that he had never taken the oath of attorney and desired to take said oath and be admitted as a member of The Florida Bar, it is

Ordered that the application of the said Bruce M. Morgan, together with the files of the State Board of Bar Examiners relative to his application for admission, be and the same are hereby referred to the Florida Board of Bar Examiners with directions that said Board conduct an investigation and inquire into and determine the character, fitness and general qualifications for admission to The Florida Bar by the said Morgan, such investigation to cover the period subsequent to the 11th day of October, 1949, and to report to this Court the results of such investigation and its recommendations with respect to said application as early as practicable.

The Florida Board of Bar Examiners is authorized as a condition precedent to conducting such investigation to require a deposit of an amount not to exceed $250 for the purpose of defraying the cost of such investigation.

DREW, C. J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, THORNAL, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • The Wiccan Religious Coop. OF Fla., Inc. v. Zingale, 898 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
    …istic rights); State v. Benitez, 395 So. 2d 514, 517 (Fla.1981) (stating that a party cannot challenge a statutory enactment that does not adversely affect that party’s personal or property rights); Chamberlin v. Dade County Bd. of Pub. Instruction, 171 So. 2d 535, 537 (Fla.1965) (holding that parents who brought suit challenging certain religiously-related practices in public schools were without standing to challenge religious practices at baccalaureate programs because their children, who were enrolled in…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw