PHILIPPIDES

v.

DAY, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. United States, 359 U.S. 41 (U.S. 1959)
  …estion of immunity was not frivolous. The following cases involving.contempt of the grand jury appear to be the only appellate decisions in the Second Circuit: O’Connell v. United States, 40 F. 2d 201 (three months with purge clause), cert. granted 281 U. S. 716, cert. dismissed on stipulation of counsel 296 U. S. 667. Lang v. United States, 55 F. 2d 922 (90 days with purge clause), cert. granted 285 U. S. 533, cert. dismissed 286 U. S. 523. United States v. Weinberg, 65 F. 2d 394 (60 days); United States v…
• Mulloney v. United States, 79 F.2d 566 (1st Cir. 1935)
  …pers before the grand jury. The question whether it was in violation of his rights under the Fifth Amendment to require him to be sworn was the precise question involved in O’Connell v. United States (C. C. A.) 40 F.(2d) 201, 205 (certiorari denied, 281 U. S. 716, 50 S. Ct. 461, 74 L. Ed. 1136). It was there said: “The final contention of the appellant is that, regardless of the details of his examination, it was a violation of his rights under the Fifth Amendment to require him to be sworn and examined bef…