BOSARGE ET AL.
v.
ALABAMA
BOSARGE ET AL.
ALABAMA
280 U.S. 568
Supreme Court of the United States (1929)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dolcin Corp. v. Fed. Trade Comm'n, 219 F.2d 742 (D.C. Cir. 1954)…Ed. 542. Not allowed: E. I. DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. White, 3 Cir., 1925, 8 F. 2d 5; Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Ammann, 3 Cir.. 1924, 296 F. 453. Compare Yarn v. Ft. Dodge D. M. & S. R. Co., 8 Cir., 31. F. 2d 717, certiorari denied, 1929, 280 U.S. 568, 50 S.Ct. 27, 74 L.Ed. 621, with Woelfle v. Conn. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 1939, 303 F. 2d 417. And see Mutual Benefit Health & Ace. Ass’n v. Francis, 8 Cir., 1945, 148 F. 2d 590. . See Lawrence v. Nutter, 4 Cir., 1953, 203 F. 2d 540. But see Ca…
-
Clinton Foods, Inc. v. Youngs, 266 F.2d 116 (8th Cir. 1959)…be taken into consideration in determining whether those in charge thereof have in fact exercised reasonable or ordinary care. Thus, this court stated in Yarn v. Fort Dodge, D. M. & S. R. Co., 8 Cir., Iowa, 1929, 31 F. 2d 717, 718, certiorari denied 280 U.S. 568, 50 S.Ct. 27, 74 L. Ed. 621, where the employee of a mining company, which was furnished electricity by defendant, was injured while removing a steam pipe in close proximity to bare high tension wires: “The defendant is not an insurer; like all oth…