WILHITE ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Austasia Intermodal Lines, Ltd. v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n & United States, 580 F.2d 642 (D.C. Cir. 1978)
  …43-44. . See Armement Deppe, S. A., v. United States, 399 F. 2d 794 (5th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1094, 89 S.Ct. 870, 21 L.Ed.2d 785 (1969); Compagnie Générale Transatlantique v. American Tobacco Co., 31 F. 2d 663 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 280 U.S. 555, 50 S.Ct. 16, 74 L.Ed. 611 (1929). . Brief for Respondents Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America at 7-8. . Act of Oct. 3, 1961, Pub.L. No. 87-346, 75 Stat. 762, 764-65. . Brief for Intervenor U.S. Atlantic & Gulf/Australia-New…
• Lyle v. Atchison, 177 F.2d 221 (7th Cir. 1949)
  …e a car had been put in a specific place for repairs, this court said “since it is clear that the car was not in use, it was erroneous to submit the case to the jury.” In Sherry v. Baltimore & O. Ry. Co., 6 Cir., 30 F. 2d 487, 489, certiorari denied 280 U.S. 555, 50 S.Ct. 16, 74 L.Ed. 611, the court, after reciting that the defective car complained of had been stored on a side track for repairs and service said: “The defectively equipped car not having been in use within the meaning of the Safety Appliance…
• Norman G. Jensen, Inc. v. Fed. Mar. Comm'n, 497 F.2d 1053 (8th Cir. 1974)
  …,” as used in the Act, is not defined but is commonly understood to mean the owner or person for whose account the carriage of the goods is undertaken. Compagnie Générale Transatlantique v. American Tobacco Co., 31 F. 2d 663 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 280 U.S. 555, 50 S.Ct. 16, 74 L.Ed. 611 (1929). The Commission, however, does not contend that ITC was the owner of the shipments which it serviced; therefore [*1057] this situation is clearly distinguishable from the dummy-forwarder cases with which the Commiss…