CONNECTICUT

v.

MASSACHUSETTS

Citator

Cited By

• Lillie v. Thompson, 332 U.S. 459 (U.S. 1947)
  …d in such commerce. The court cited Davis v. Green, 260 U. S. 349 (1922); St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co. v. Mills, 271 U. S. 344 (1926); Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Southwell, 275 U. S. 64 (1927); and Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line R. Co. v. Green, 279 U. S. 821 (1929), reversing per curiam, 151 S. C. 1, 148 S. E. 633. See Restatement of Torts, § 302, Comment n: “n. The actor’s conduct may create a situation which affords an opportunity or temptation to third persons to commit more serious forms of miscon…
• IRA S. Bushey & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 398 F.2d 167 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …hich was applied in St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co. v. Mills, 271 U.S. 344, 46 S.Ct. 520, 70 L.Ed. 979 (1926) ; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Southwell, 275 U.S. 64, 48 S.Ct. 25, 72 L.Ed. 157 (1927) ; and Atlanta & Charlotte Air Line R. Co. v. Green, 279 U.S. 821, 49 S.Ct. 350, 73 L.Ed. 976 (1929). However, we agree with Chief Judge Murrah that the Supreme Court would not follow Davis today, despite its author’s eminence. Copeland v. St. Louis-San Francisco R. Co., 291 F. 2d 119, 121, 123 (10 Cir. 1961) (dis…
• South Carolina v. North Carolina, 558 U.S. 256 (U.S. 2010)
  …e also summarily denied motions to intervene in other water disputes between the States. See Arizona v. California, 514 U. S. 1081 (1995); Arizona v. California, 345 U. S. 914 (1953); Nebraska v. Wyoming, 296 U. S. 548 (1935); Wisconsin v. Illinois, 279 U. S. 821 (1929). And we have strongly intimated in other decisions (albeit in dictum) that private entities can rarely, if ever, intervene in original actions involving the apportionment of interstate waterways. See United States v. Nevada, supra, at 538 (…