EXCHANGE DRUG CO.
v.
MCNEEL, CHAIRMAN, ET AL.

U.S. | 1929-01-02
No. 511
278 U.S. 577 Supreme Court of the United States (1929) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed on the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction, on the ground that the decree sought to be reviewed is not a final one. Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Arnold v. United States for the use of Guimarin & Co., 263 U. S. 427, 434.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Gerradin v. United Fruit Co. (E.D.N.Y. 1931)
    …oration and the decedent, who was also a Canadian. The court held that the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 USCA §§ 51-59) did not apply, although that is said to be the argument of “the flag.” The decision was affirmed but not on this point. , 278 U. S. 577, 49 S. Ct. 176, 73 L. Ed. 516. U. S. v. Jenkins (1838) 26 Fed. Cas. 603, No. 15473. In a criminal ease, it is said that ownership determines a vessel’s national character, and may be shown in the same manner as that of any other chattel. The vessel…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw