STANDARD PIPE LINE COMPANY, INC., ET AL.
v.
COMMISSIONERS OF INDEX SULPHUR DRAINAGE DISTRICT

U.S. | 1928-10-15
No. 11
278 U.S. 558 Supreme Court of the United States (1928) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The writ of certiorari is dismissed for.the' reason that the decree Of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based on a nonfederal ground adequate to support it. Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271. Mr. Henry Moore, Jr., for respondents.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Rice v. Sioux City Mem'l Park Cemetery, Inc., 349 U.S. 70 (U.S. 1955)
    …275 U. S. 486; Mellon v. McKinley, 275 U. S. 492; Missouri-K.-T. R. Co. v. Texas, 275 U. S. 494; Ellison v. Koswig, 276 U. S. 598; Johnson v. Thornburgh, 276 U. S. 601; Carter Oil Co. v. Eli, 277 U. S. 573; Standard Pipe Line Co. v. Commissioners, 278 U. S. 558; Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Johnson, 278 U. S. 576; New York, Chicago & St. L. R. Co. v. Granfell, ibid.; Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. Saunders, 278 U. S. 581; Virginian R. Co. v. Kirk, 278 U. S. 582; Wallace v. Motor Products Corp., 279 U. S. 859; Su…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw