S. S. KRESGE COMPANY
v.
CITY OF DAYTON, OHIO, AND GUSTAV A. NIEHUS, CHIEF INSPECTOR

U.S. | 1927-12-05
No. 109
275 U.S. 505 Supreme Court of the United States (1927) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on the authority of St. Louis Poster Advertising Company v. City of St. Louis, 249 U. S. 269, 274; Maguire v. Reardon, 225 U. S. 271, 272; Walls v. Midland Carbon Company, 254 U. S. 300, 324.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • King Mfg. Co. v. City Council of Augusta, 277 U.S. 100 (U.S. 1928)
    …a number of cases. Beery v. Houghton, 273 U. S. 671 (Per Curiam); Ohio ex rel. Clarke v. Deckebach, 274 U. S. 392; Angelo v. Winston-Salem, 274 U. S. 725 (Per Curiam); Bloecher & Schaaf v. Baltimore, 275 U. S. 490 (Per Curiam); Kresge Co. v. Dayton, 275 U. S. 505 (Per Curiam). Compare Natchez v. McNedy, 275 U. S. 502 (Per Ciiriam). But in none of them did [*135] counsel question the jurisdiction of this Court, or call to our attention the significance of the amendment of § 237 made by the Act of 1925. It…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw