MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY OF TEXAS
v.
J. H. KING
MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RAILROAD COMPANY OF TEXAS
J. H. KING
275 U.S. 504
Supreme Court of the United States (1927)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Reversed on the authority of American Railway Express Company v. Daniel, 269 U. S. 40, 42; American Railway Express v. Levee, 263 U. S. 19, 21 ; American Railway Express Company v. Lindenburg, 260 U. S. 584, 592; Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Company v. Woodbury et al., 254 U. S. 357, 360; Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Carl, 227 U. S. 639, 653, 656.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nebbia v. New York, 291 U.S. 502 (U.S. 1934)…ghter House Cases, 16 Wall. 36; Conway v. Taylor’s Executor, 1 Black 603; Crowley v. Christensen, 137 U.S, 86, Madera Water Works v. Madera, 228 U.S. 454; Jones v. Portland, 245 U.S. 217; Green v. Frazier, 253 U.S. 233; Standard Oil Co. v. Lincoln, 275 U.S. 504. As instances of Acts of Congress regulating private businesses consistently with the due process guarantee of the Fifth Amendment the court cites those fixing rates to be charged at private wharves, by. chimney-sweeps and hackneys, cartmen, wagone…
-
New State Ice Co. v. Liebmann, 285 U.S. 262 (U.S. 1932)…believed that they [*305] cannot be secured at reasonable prices from the private dealers. Thus, a city may, if the local law permits, buy and sell at retail coal and wood, Jones v. Portland, 245 U. S. 217; or gasoline, Standard Oil Co. v. Lincoln, 275 U. S. 504. And a State may, if permitted by its own Constitution, build and operate warehouses, "elevators, packinghouses, flour mills or other factories, Green v. Frazier, 253 U. S. 233. As States may engage in a business, because it is a public purpose to a…
-
Louis K. Liggett Co. v. LEE, 288 U.S. 517 (U.S. 1933)…mpanies.68 Or, the citizens of Florida might conceivably escape from the domination of giant corporations by having the State engage in business. Compare Jones v. Portland, 245 U. S. 217; Green v. Frazier, 253 U. S. 233; Standard Oil Co. v. Lincoln, 275 U. S. 504. But Americans seeking escape from corporate domination have open to thém under the Constitution another form of social and economic control—one more in keeping with our traditions and aspirations. They may prefer the way of cooperation, which leads…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kan. City S. Ry. Co. v. Carl, 227 U.S. 639 (U.S. 1913)
- Am. Ry. Express Co. v. Lindenburg, 260 U.S. 584 (U.S. 1923)
- Am. Ry. Express Co. v. Levee, 263 U.S. 19 (U.S. 1923)
- Am. Ry. Express Co. v. Daniel, 269 U.S. 40 (U.S. 1925)
- Calveston v. Woodbury, 254 U.S. 357 (U.S. 1920)