MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF NATCHEZ
v.
S. B. MCNEELY AND MRS. LOUISA MCNEELY, ADMINISTRATRIX; AND MRS. LOUISA MCNEELY, ADMINISTRATRIX, V. MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF NATCHEZ
MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF NATCHEZ
S. B. MCNEELY AND MRS. LOUISA MCNEELY, ADMINISTRATRIX; AND MRS. LOUISA MCNEELY, ADMINISTRATRIX, V. MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE CITY OF NATCHEZ
275 U.S. 502
Supreme Court of the United States (1927)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Affirmed on the authority of Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the Town of Vidalia v. McNeely, Administratrix, and McNeely, Administratrix, v. Mayor and Board of Aldermen of the Town of Vidalia, 274 U. S. 630.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Roberts v. The Am. Nat'l Bank of Pensacola, 97 Fla. 411 (Fla. 1929)…tes. The ease of Commercial etc., v. Custer County, 76 Montana 45, 245 Pac. R. 259, and other similar cases (see First Nat. Bank of Glendive v. Dawson County, 66 Montana 321, 213 Pac. R. 1097) were reversed in Commercial Nat. Bank v. Custer County, 275 U. S. 502, 48 Sup. Ct. R. 155, 72 L. Ed. 395, “on the authority of First National Bank v. Hartford, 273 U. S. 548, 559, 560, 71 L. Ed. 767, 773, 774, 59 A. L. R. 1, 47 Sup. Ct. R. 462; Minnesota v. First National Bank, 273 U. S. 561, 567, 568, 71 L. Ed. 774,…
-
King Mfg. Co. v. City Council of Augusta, 277 U.S. 100 (U.S. 1928)…Curiam); Ohio ex rel. Clarke v. Deckebach, 274 U. S. 392; Angelo v. Winston-Salem, 274 U. S. 725 (Per Curiam); Bloecher & Schaaf v. Baltimore, 275 U. S. 490 (Per Curiam); Kresge Co. v. Dayton, 275 U. S. 505 (Per Curiam). Compare Natchez v. McNedy, 275 U. S. 502 (Per Ciiriam). But in none of them did [*135] counsel question the jurisdiction of this Court, or call to our attention the significance of the amendment of § 237 made by the Act of 1925. It is well settled that the exercise of jurisdiction under…
-
Commercial Nat. Bank v. Treas. of Franklin Cnty. (S.D. Ohio 1930)…70 L. Ed. 295; First National Bank v. Hartford (Wis.) 273 U. S. 548, 47 S. Ct. 482, 71 L. Ed. 767, 59 A. L. R. 1; Minnesota v. First National Bank (Minn.) 273 U. S. 561, 47 S. Ct. 468, 71 L. Ed. 771; Commercial National Bank v. Custer County (Mont.) 275 U. S. 502, 48 S. Ct. 155, 72 L. Ed. 395; Montana National Bank v. Yellowstone County (Mont.) 276 U. S. 499, 48 S. Ct. 331, 72 L. Ed. 673. in the Virginia case (Merchants’ National Bank v. City of Richmond, 256 U. S. 635, 41 S. Ct. 619, 620, 65 L. Ed. 1135),…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Portneuf-Marsh Valley Canal Co. v. Brown, 274 U.S. 630 (U.S. 1927)