W. T. PHILLIPS, JR., ET AL., ETC., SUBSTITUTED FOR OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS COMPANY
v.
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
W. T. PHILLIPS, JR., ET AL., ETC., SUBSTITUTED FOR OKLAHOMA NATURAL GAS COMPANY
STATE OF OKLAHOMA
274 U.S. 721
Supreme Court of the United States (1927)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed under § 237 of the Judicial Code as amended by the Act. of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, and, treating the writ of error as an application for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
King Mfg. Co. v. City Council of Augusta, 277 U.S. 100 (U.S. 1928)…e & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 274 U. S. 344, and in Aetna Insurance Co. v. Hyde, 275 U. S. 440, the review was by certiorari. In Aetna Insurance Co. v. Baker, 276 U. S. 628, certiorari was denied. Compare Phillips v. Oklahoma, 274 U. S. 721 (Per Curiam); Phillips v. Okla homa, 275 U. S. 489 (Per Curiam); Missouri v. Public-Service Commission, 275 U. S. 489 (Per Curiam), Mr. Chief Justice Chase explained why the Act should be construed as applying only to statutes and not to municipal…