WONG HAY POY, WONG TUNG HUNG AND WONG BING YUEN
v.
JOHN D. NAGLE, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION
WONG HAY POY, WONG TUNG HUNG AND WONG BING YUEN
JOHN D. NAGLE, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION
273 U.S. 645
Supreme Court of the United States (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
Dismissed under § 238 of the Judicial Code as amended in § 1 of the Act of February 13, 1925.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121 (U.S. 1959)…ate, 191 Ind. 410, 133 N. E. 200; Dashing v. State, 78 Ind. 357. Iowa. State v. Moore, 143 Iowa 240, 121 N. W. 1052. Kentucky. Hall v. Commonwealth, 197 Ky. 179, 246 S. W. 441. Louisiana. State v. Breaux, 161 La. 368, 108 So. 773, aff’d per cur., 273 U. S. 645. Maine. See State v. Gauthier, 12. Me. 522, 529-531, 118 A. 380, 383-385. Massachusetts. Commonwealth v. Nickerson, 236 Mass. 281, 128 N. E. 273. Michigan. In re Illova, 351 Mich. 204, 88 N. W. 2d 589. Minnesota. State v. Holm, 139 Minn. 267, 16…